Hitler & Violence

part 1 - Hitler

“What have conservatives conserved - what have progressives progressed?” is the question often asked by dissident right-wingers pointing out that our two main political camps have worked towards the current world order and all its problems, seeking only to maintain said problems and worsen them. They may claim otherwise, and say: “actually, we propose this and that-” but all it really amounts to more and more colored people ordering more and more hamburgers from self-checkouts at McDonalds in perpetuity, using more and more of our money and time to uphold them and the credentialed drooling class’ lifestyle to produce more articles and cultural items that extol the virtues of democracy, women and minorities.

We all know this, thats why we’re here looking for a way out that rejects the current world order and all of its values to ultimately steer our societies onto a new path, or back to a very old one that’s been abandoned. The closest thing we have in living memory to a revolt against modernity is in Hitler as he faced much the same problems and opponents we are up against today and thus has become a proxy for a rejection of the liberal project and all its ills. Theres no functional differences here between liberalism and the plethora of leftist ideologies from social democrat to marxism, all these fall under the umbrella of liberalism in todays context because their primary goal is the uplifting of non-whites, women, sexual degenerates and the deformed at the expense of everything else, they have merged with early 20th century radical communist ideology in making treason to their race and nation a virtue while promoting female equality, homosexuality and minority rights. Theres no difference between them and our conservatives either since in every way they could challenge the ideology of liberalism in a meaningful can be construed as “Racist!” and thus “Hitler!” makes them turn tail and meekly retreat at the invokation of this mans reputation, turning them into a feckless and slightly unwilling third wheel to the liberal project. The communists won world war 2 and the cold war, today even “conservatives” defend radical communist concepts which before the war were so beyond the pale that some socialists felt they went too far.

Hence the “Hitler” part of the call Hitler & Violence I coined over a year ago, originally just as a way to weed out and shame people who purported to be dissidents and speak for a total rejection of the liberal order to dissident audiences yet refused to go far enough to truly break with the established morality. If they cant do it on the internet, imagine what they’d do in positions of power when they have to interact with and influence other people, they’d turn conservative and meekly retreat in the face of accusations of Hitler. Its dangerous to call on this mans name who has in the liberal mythos been raised up to the status of an evil god, beyond human, his followers persecuted like the followers of christ today for nothing but for their faith, faith in a project that sought to ultimately break with the liberal order of today. Liberals know Hitler is the breaker of their ideology, hence why they inculcate every new young generation with an impulsive, emotional fear of him to make his name an intellectual stumbling block that stops all thought before one can fully form, so why should we who do seek the undoing of liberalism not treat him as the one who can break liberalisms chains?

Ceasar came onto the political scene in a time of great decay, while the established democratic order was defended by a corrupt and sclerotic class of oligarchs who paid lipservice to the ideals of the old republic, lived lives and promoted values that would have been anathema to the romans who built their nation. Wealth and easy living in the rich cities had made the elite grow soft and decadent, while setting up new client kingdoms they were happy to live off the riches that trade and the influx of cheap brown labour was bringing their estates, fundamentally changing the racial make-up of Italy in the process. Ceasar made a mockery of their pretence at republicanism by openly bragging about the bribes he had placed to win elections, a form of voting manipulation that was by this point a mainstay of the system everyone took part in but one which was kept low key. Ceasars displays of corruption irked the democratic elite to no end, making a mockery of their legitimacy in the process. They had no scrupules in bending the law and making new laws just to drag Ceasar in front of a court and destroy his political career, despotism enforced by a clique. It is to Ceasars benefit that he was young and audacious enough to dare to bend and break the law when possible to come out on top instead of meekly submitting himself to be henpicked in court by people who were only different from him in their lack of ambition and vision. Ultimately he had to resort to the only means he had left and declare war on the state, his audacious and resolute posture in the face of his enemies did nothing but inspire the loyalty in his followers which saw him through to the end.

Why do I bring this up? Imagine Ceasar had been defeated in his civil war, all populares leaders arrested and executed, their powerbases destroyed and a new Rome would emerge where the old democratic oligarchs created a new mythos where men like Ceasar were to be guarded against on every level of society in a bid to strenghten their grip on power. A century would pass and generals of legions were all senate approved docile political animals, everyone knew the story of Ceasar who wanted to burn Rome and eat babies alive and that he can pop out of a mirror and kill you if you say his name three times in the dark of night. You might have some objections to this as a historically interested citizen, about the popular imagination of the man versus the reality, you might even have proof the myths of Ceasar killing 10 million people in Gaul are forgeries, hinting at a veiled sympathy for Ceasar but you better not speak in public about these things if you value your career and/or life. Any invocation of his name and you’re liable to be arrested, tried and executed as an enemy of the republic. Theres no telling what would’ve happened in such a story other than that the ruling class would continue to degenerate over time into a less and less functioning body to deal with the problems of state while putting more and more emphasis on the pet projects bored rich people engage in such as fawning over their exotic slaves and engaging in unnatural sexual acts to eventually be extinguised several centuries earlier as a civilization by a more martial and virile people. Ceasar bought Rome the renewal it needed to extend its lifetime by several centuries if only to remove the most rotten segment of its population from the levers of power and seizing it for himself. In such a dark alternative-timeline the true patriots who love Rome would keep the memory of Ceasar and the true noble purpose of his quest alive, looking for an opportunity to finish what he started and eject the parasitical democrat class from the levers of power. They would be “the people” and the true legitimate guardians of Romes welfare no matter how much the Ciceronian regime decried them as dangerous traitors or how small a minority they became in the sea of brown slave labour said regime imported into their once free land. The only way forward is Ceasar, the only alternative is slavery & death.

Im reminded of the story of Robin Hood where the infamously incompetent king little John is driving the kingdom into the ground, the good-hearted and downtrodden people of England hold out hope for the true kings return, his older brother Richard. He has the legitimacy, he inspired the nation and ruled it wisely, and one day he will return to depose his little brother and the golden age will return once he returns from his crusade in the east. Hitler really is treated like the deposed legitimate ruler of the west in a spiritual sense, in that long after his passing the drooling classes cannot stop decrying him and defacing his image as if their legitimacy was on such weak grounds that even a neutral perspective on the deposed monarch would make light of their illegitimate usurpation and put lie to their claims of providing a better vision of the future. As with the Stuarts, Hitler has become his times banner around which all people disaffectioned with the current dynasty can rally around, having been mythologized to such an extent among the young that his gravitas exceeds many monarchs of old who claimed to rule by divine right. Children can see the world clearer than adults, and theres a hairsbreath of difference between the greatest evil force on earth and a demi-god. Its the children who have recieved the same emotionally wrought religious indoctrination as I did who, when breaking with the liberal ideology in one way or another, end up worshipping Hitler as a force greater than any living man. He is at least the greatest force known on earth to trigger liberals with, and for that alone his reputation will continue to grow with time.

It doesnt matter much anymore today what Hitler actually believed, did or stood for. We have already created a new image of him in modernity which is animate in our culture, most important of which is that he wouldnt have stood for liberal bullshit coming out of academia or humoring blacks and thats the only thing which matters. To be against him is to accept all the presuppositions and values of the system, to be for him means a total break with the values of modernity, raising the rebel flag of defiance. The many takes on the right about how “actually-” Hitler wasnt so good or did this thing wrong and “Im really based just not of the Hitler sort, please believe me!” All these mental hoops they need to jump through to justify their cowardly decision to implicitly pay homage to liberalism while claiming to renounce it, we know the score, you’re not fooling anybody. If there were no social costs to endorsing Hitler you would have no problem stepping up to liberals in their spaces and flashing a swastika armband, perhaps get a hearty chuckle out of how “the liberals are triggered”, but there is a social cost because he’s the avatar of real meaningful change in modernity - you’re just not willing to accept any of those costs because youre a coward, fraud & not a man who is serious- or going to change anything politically. That’s ok, most people need a leader with more bravery than them to give them courage to rally to the flag, just dont try to sell me some bullshit about how we need to steer away from Hitler or how he isnt relevant or how he was stupid, thats something you have to convince yourself of to make yourself sleep at night. You’re just a liberal whenever you counter-signal Hitler and deserve nothing but the collective scorn and ridicule of the entire dissident right when you do. We have all of society as a designated safe-space to pour scorn on Hitler, why do you feel the need to come here just to cosplay as a libtard in based-clothing?

Standing up to the current world order requires the courage to meet it head on, “Endorse Hitler and violence” is a good litmus test to divide the viable candidates from the grifters. We arent going to subvert it, youre not going to be able to “sneak in” national socialism into the system by being coy, theres not going to be a march through the institutions, we arent ever going to logically out-debate the other side into submission. If owning liberals with facts & logic translated into political capital we wouldve abolished liberalism in 2016. What needs to happen is you taking the sword to the gordian knot that is “Hitler bad!” if only to demolish this thought which stops all thinking, on the other side of that is everything you want: clean cities, morality, ethnic homogeneity, disenfranchisement of pink haired ladies, ethics in video game journalism. You name it, its all locked up behind this stumbling block and youre not going to get past it until you break through it and can at the very least shrug and be indifferent on Hitler. You like him? Sure, thats fine. Go ahead and be Hitler, its all the same to me, I got nothing against the guy. Me ne frego.

Jews will make out Hitler to be about anti-semitism but thats just because Jews make everything about themselves, we cant have any polticis of our own without them stepping in to talk about how everything is about them and blah blah blah. If anything it’s a good exercise in learning to ignore what jews say, which like learning to ignore what your mother says, is an important part of growing up after your balls drop (provided nature gave you a pair). They dont have the power to decide your thinking for you unless you let them and if you’re just going to have a foreign tribe dictate your interests, thoughts and values to you then how can you say to represent yourself and your interests? No one has the power to dictate what I should and shouldn’t think, I alone judge what’s in my best interests even if the whole world disagrees, Hitler is the ideology of the sovereign man who can stand alone, apart from the world and he only has this power because of the power liberals have built up in his mythos.

“Well that ended in a bunker last time” and variants of this I hear as a counter-argument is such a loser mindset, they are buckbroken losers who take one defeat to mean they can never stand up for themselves again instead of like all the winners of history who refuse to “learn from history” and simply keep doing the same thing over and over and over again until they win. The Romans didnt learn to be an irrelevant city-state after the gauls sacked it the first time, they didnt learn they cant defeat Carthage after Cannae, the Germanics didnt learn they cant beat the romans after losing a hundred pitched battles against them, and in the end they conquered Rome instead of the other way around, because they refused to learn from history the way liberals do. This is an intrinsic difference between people who are born & bred to be slaves and those of noble free spirit. Which goes into people who argue “Hitler bad because he lost”, these are natural slaves who merely worship power because their ancestors have been living as serfs and slaves for thousands of years which has genetically fixed their gaze on hand holding whip above their head as survival instinct. Therefore you should know not to take ques from them on anything else related to politics or philosophy as they are as different to you as you are to the cattle in your barn, even if they speak english legibly you could never ever truly understand them because their perspective on life is so different to that of ours.

The opponent is a holistic spirit that encompasses politics, religion, economics, demographics and culture. Its a spirit of liberalism (which I call Satan the ruler of this world who wishes to dement and torment all mankind, as theyre the same thing but if you’re more secularly inclined you can call it liberalism) that is a pox on the mind and soul of man, you dont get to pick and choose which parts you want to oppose and think you can work with other parts. All the trees in the garden are poisonous, one bite of any of the fruits in the garden will kill you, no matter how much you say that its “just that feminist tree over there thats bad”. All attempts at half-measures will inevitably just give way to complete leftist dogma and after that give way to even far more radically left-wing & destructive ideas than you even could have imagined. The only thing which stops this poisonous miasma and seems to repel it effectively and completely is the spirit of Hitler which our enemies themselves identify as their undoer. Therefore there exists no alternative to Hitler as a dissident, and only those who rally to his rebel banner can be said to be the true vanguard of Europa’s interests.